by Barbara Sattler, DrPH, RN ; Brenda M. Afzal, MS, RN
Expiration Date: December 31, 2011. No CE contact hours (CH) will be given after this date. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table of Contents
Every school day, parents send their children to school with the hopes that they will be healthy and safe and will receive an education. A variety of environmental risks may be posed in some schools that can make them potentially unsafe and unhealthy, and hinder children's ability to learn. This independent study module (ISM) provides the reader with a brief overview of some of the key environmental health risks associated with schools. Information is presented about the environmental exposures, signs and symptoms of toxicity, and the nurse's role as an agent of change to help encourage and produce healthy and safe schools. Children's special vulnerabilities are described, as well as child-specific information regarding the toxicity associated with exposures. Pesticides, mercury, asbestos, formaldehyde, radon and carbon monoxide poisonings are discussed. Because indoor air quality can be an important variable affecting the learning process, a general section on this issue is presented. Suggestions are provided addressing environmental health and safety problems, including the use of health and safety committees, as well as advocacy education approaches. A resource section provides a brief listing of resources; many of them are websites, which, in turn will link the reader to additional resources. The EPA's website will be found to be particularly helpful, especially the children's section and the Indoor Air Quality Tools for Schools section, as well as the healthy schools network website. The purpose of this independent study module is to introduce the reader to basic concepts and issues associated with environmental health risks to children in schools. The University of Maryland has created a new web site, envirn.umaryland.edu , that contains links to all of the websites noted in this ISM. Objectives
Introduction There have been two shifts in our environmental concerns since the early environmental
movement in the 1960's and 1970's. The first has been a shift from a strictly ecological
focus, where concerns centered on man's negative effects on the natural world, to concern
specifically about the risks posed to human health. Even more focused has been our
interest in children's health. The second shift has been to be more attentive to the
environmental risks associated with the "built" environment: our homes, office buildings,
and schools. This shift has helped to raise awareness about indoor air quality; the
existence of and manner by which we control pests (including insects, molds,
fungus/mildew, and rodents); and the health risks associated with the products that we
use to construct buildings and those products that we bring into our homes, schools, and
offices. Increasingly, concerns are being raised about school buildings, the built
environment that one sixth of the U.S. population can be found in, Monday through
Friday, during the school year. Our concerns are further heightened because the majority
of people found in school buildings are children, who may have distinct vulnerabilities to
environmental health risks. There are some quick fixes that can be accomplished for school-based environmental
health risks but some environmental health problems will have existed for years;
identifying and reducing them may take time. Some risks are quite complex and will
require changes in purchasing practices; rehab and renovation specifications; and
upgrades of ventilation systems. The best way to address any of the problems will be
from an informed position and with the support of others in the education setting. Take
time to read the section on health and safety committees; health and safety committees
can create a win-win platform for creating environmentally healthy schools that will be
safe workplaces and healthy learning places. Toxicology, a critical science in environmental health, is the study of the negative effect
of a physical stressor (chemical, biological, or radioactive) on a biological system (a cell,
tissue, organ, organ system, or organism). The key variables in determining the
relationship between an exposure to a stressor and a health effect are: 1) the "dose" of the
exposure; 2) the "duration" of the exposure; 3) the "toxicity" or strength of the toxin; and
4) a variety of "host factors" (such as age, sex, health status, other exposures).
Environmental toxins can enter the human body by ingestion, inhalation, and dermal
exposure. People may ingest toxic chemicals in their drinking water, as well as foods
and beverages. Air pollutants can affect many body systems. Some toxic exposures,
such as solvents and some pesticides, can be absorbed through the skin. In the same way that the desired effects of pharmacological agents are dose-dependent
and depend on host factors, the effects elicited by toxic chemicals in our environment are
dose-dependent and dependent on host factors. This concept is extremely important
when discussing children's special vulnerabilities to environmental exposures because a
number of variables influence the dose of toxic chemicals to which children are exposed. Children's Special Vulnerabilities Children are not just little adults. They are different in many ways, particularly with
regard to their exposures and responses to the environment. As nurses, we know that
infants and young children breathe more rapidly than adults. This increase in respiratory
rate may translate into a proportionately greater exposure to air pollutants. While
infants' lungs are developing, they may also be susceptible to environmental toxicants.
Behaviors characteristic of early childhood also affect a child's exposure to toxicants. In
the first years of life, the young child spends hours close to the ground where he or she may be exposed to toxicants in dust, soil and carpets as well as to pesticide vapors in low-lying layers of air. (Visit www.cehn.org/cehn/WhatisPEH. html. ) Infants and young children drink more fluids per body weight than adults, potentially
increasing their dose of contaminants found in their drinking water, milk, and juices
(particularly pesticides). For example, the average infant's daily consumption of six
ounces of formula or breast milk per kilogram of body weight is equivalent to an adult
male drinking 50 eight-ounce glasses of milk a day (Bearer, 1995). Children also eat
more per body weight and they eat different proportions of food. How many adults could
eat the same amount of raisins pound-for-pound as the average two-year-old? Children
consume many more fruits and fruit juices than adults, which may result in larger doses
of exposure to pesticide residues. Children play on the floor, the grass, and the playground, placing them at increased risk
for exposure to toxic chemicals that may be applied to or settle on the floors or ground,
including lead-based paint dust, cleaning product residues, and horticultural/agricultural
chemicals (fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides). The hand-to-mouth exploration of the
infant and young child that helps them to learn about their world also places them at
higher risk of exposures. This is particularly true in the case of lead-based paint dust
when it is present in houses and schools. Because metabolic systems are still developing
in the fetus and child, their ability to detoxify and excrete toxins differs from that of
adults. This difference is sometimes to the child's advantage, but more frequently they
are not able to excrete toxins as well as adults, and thus are more vulnerable to them. Children's bodies also function differently than adults. The rate at which children absorb
nutrients from the gastrointestinal tract is likewise different than the rate for adults, a fact
that can impact their exposure to toxicants. For example, children have a greater need for
calcium for bone development than do adults and will absorb more of this element when
it is present in the gastrointestinal tract. When lead has been ingested into the gut,
however, the body will absorb it in place of calcium. Consequently, an adult will absorb
10 percent of ingested lead, while a toddler will absorb 50 percent of ingested lead
(Bearer, 1995). And finally, some of the protective mechanisms that are well developed
in adults, like the blood-brain barrier, are immature in young children, thereby making
them more vulnerable to the effects of some toxic chemicals. Why Indoor Air Quality Is Important Most people are aware that outdoor air pollution can pose health risks, but many do not
know that indoor air pollution can also have significant health effects. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) studies of human exposure to air pollutants indicate that indoor
levels of pollutants may be 2-5 times, and occasionally more than 100 times, higher than
outdoor levels. These levels of indoor air pollutants may be of particular concern because
most people spend about 90 percent of their time indoors. Perhaps the most sensitive of
school building inhabitants are asthmatic children. Based on a 1997 National Health
Interview Survey (CDC, 2001), it was estimated that 25.7 million people had been
diagnosed with asthma by a health professional in their lifetime. That estimate increased
to 26.3 million in 1998. The highest prevalence was seen in children 5-17 years of age,
with 130.1 per 1,000 in 1997 and 135.0 per 1,000 in 1998 (CDC, 2001). Asthma
accounts for an estimated 10.1 million lost school days annually (CDC, 2001).
In recent years, comparative risk studies performed by EPA and its advisory board have consistently ranked indoor air pollution among the top five environmental risks to public health. Children may be especially susceptible to air pollution. The same concentration of pollutants can result in higher body burdens in children than adults because children breathe a greater volume of air relative to their body weight. Over the past several decades, our exposure to indoor air pollutants has increased due to a variety of factors, including the construction and renovation of more tightly sealed buildings, reduced ventilation rates to save energy, the use of synthetic building materials and furnishings, and the use of personal care products, pesticides, and housekeeping supplies. In addition, our activities and decisions, such as deferring maintenance to "save" money, can lead to problems from sources and ventilation. Indoor air pollutants can originate within the building or be drawn in from outdoors. If pollutant sources are not controlled, indoor air quality (IAQ) problems can arise, even if the heating ventilation and air condition (HVAC) system is properly designed, operated, and maintained. Air contaminants consist of particles, dust, fibers, bioaerosols, and gases or vapors. Indoor air pollutant concentration levels can vary by time and location within the school building, or even a single classroom. Pollutants can be emitted from point sources, such as science storerooms, or from area sources, such as newly painted surfaces. Also, pollutants can vary with time, such as only when floor stripping is done, or continuously, such as mold growing in the HVAC system.
Heating, ventilation, and air condition system design and operation can impact the temperature, humidity, and contaminant level in the building. The heating, ventilation, and cooling system includes all heating, cooling, and ventilating equipment serving a school: boilers or furnaces, chillers, cooling towers, air handling units, exhaust fans, ductwork, and filters. A properly designed and functioning HVAC system:
Not all HVAC systems are designed to accomplish all of these functions. Some buildings rely only on natural ventilation. Others lack mechanical cooling equipment, and many function with little or no humidity control. Nurses are often the only health care providers in the school setting. School nurses are aware of the health status of the students and those with particular vulnerabilities. This knowledge and awareness places school nurses in a special position to make a link between health effects experienced by the school population and the environmental conditions within the school. School nurses have a tremendous opportunity to educate students, parents, and staff and provide resources regarding IAQ issues. By tracking and documenting symptoms, and association with particular rooms or areas in the school building, nurses can provide a crucial role in connecting health complaints to the school environment. Indoor Air Quality problems are most likely to affect those with preexisting health conditions and those who are exposed to tobacco smoke. Student health records should include information about known allergies and other medically documented conditions, such as asthma, as well as any reported sensitivity to chemicals. Privacy considerations may limit the student health information that can be disclosed, but to the extent possible, information about students' potential sensitivity to IAQ problems should be provided to teachers. This is especially true for classes involving potential irritants (e.g., gaseous or particle emissions from art, science, or industrial/vocational education sources).
"Pesticides are substances intended to destroy, control or repel pests, such as insects, weeds, fungi, rodents, and bacteria. Depending upon the dose, pesticides may cause a range of harm such as cancer, acute or chronic injury to the lungs, nervous, reproductive, and endocrine and immune system damage and may accumulate in the environment. Children are at greater risk of pesticide exposure than adults because pound for pound of body weight, children not only eat more and breathe more, but they also have a more rapid metabolism than adults and they play on the floor and lawn where pesticides are commonly applied". There is a growing body of scientific data about the harmful effects that pesticides have on children's health, both acute and chronic. Acute affects of exposure include eye and throat irritation, skin rashes, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headaches, flu-like symptoms, upper respiratory distress, and in extreme cases, death. Chronic effects (those that appear long after exposure) include an increased risk of some types of cancer, reproductive impairment, and neurological damage (US EPA, 1999). Several studies have examined the relationship between childhood cancers (brain cancer, Ewing's sarcoma, Wilm's tumor, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) and pesticide exposures (McBride, 1998; Daniels, 1997; Buckley, 2000; Meinert, 2000; Infante-Rivard, 1999). The potential risks illustrated by these studies suggest a need for a precautionary approach when dealing with pesticide exposures and children. Dr. Elizabeth Guillette (1998) identified two groups of Mexican children who were similar in all respects, but one, their exposure to pesticides. High levels of multiple pesticides were found in the cord blood of newborns that lived in an agricultural valley area as compared to children who lived in the foothills where pesticide use is avoided. Children in both groups were asked to draw a picture of a person. Their drawings (in figures 1 and 2) graphically illustrate the effect pesticides had on study participants' neurological development.
Routes of exposure to pesticides include inhalation, ingestion, and dermal penetration. Eighty percent of ambient exposures to pesticides occur indoors; measurable levels of up to a dozen pesticides have been found in the air inside of homes (US EPA, 1988).
"Integrated pest management [IPM] is an increasingly useful approach to minimizing pesticide use while providing long-term pest control. It integrates both chemical and non-chemical methods to provide the least toxic alternative for pest control" (American Academy of Pediatrics, 1999). Traditional pest control has relied heavily on pesticides as the first plan of attack. IPM differs in that it does not automatically rely on pesticide application. Schools should adopt an official IPM statement to serve as a guide for the process of development, implementation, and evaluation of a program. If no IPM program exists, a committee should be organized to develop a program.
Asbestos is a mineral fiber. It can be positively identified only with a special type of microscope. There are several types of asbestos fibers. In the past, asbestos was added to a variety of products to strengthen them and to provide heat insulation and fire resistance. From studies of people who were exposed to asbestos in factories and shipyards, we know that breathing high levels of asbestos fibers can lead to an increased risk of lung cancer; mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining of the chest and the abdominal cavity; and asbestosis, in which the lungs become scarred with fibrous tissue. The risk of lung cancer and mesothelioma increases with the number of fibers inhaled. The risk of lung cancer from inhaling asbestos fibers is also greater for smokers. People who get asbestosis have usually been exposed to high levels of asbestos for a long time. The symptoms of these diseases do not usually appear until about 20 to 30 years after the first exposure to asbestos. Most people exposed to small amounts of asbestos, as we all are in our daily lives, do not develop these health problems. However, if disturbed, asbestos material may release asbestos fibers, which can be inhaled into the lungs. The fibers can remain there for a long time, increasing the risk of disease. Asbestos material that would crumble easily if handled, or that has been sawed, scraped, or sanded into a powder, is more likely to create a health hazard (Available on-line at www.epa.gov/iaq/pubs/asbestos.html). Intact, undisturbed asbestos-containing materials generally do not pose a health risk. They may become hazardous and pose increased risk when they are damaged, are disturbed in some manner such as during school renovation and repair, or deteriorate over time and thus release asbestos fibers into building air. In response to the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, EPA published the Asbestos-in-Schools Rule. The rule requires public and private elementary and secondary schools to inspect for friable (easily crumbled) and non-friable asbestos, develop management plans to address hazards, and conduct responses to eliminate the asbestos. The rule also specifies training, examination, and other requirements to accredit persons who do this work, and sets requirements for warning signs and transportation and disposal of materials containing asbestos. Additional information about the federal laws regulating asbestos in schools can be found on the EPA web site at www.epa.gov/asbestos/pubs/asbestos_in_schools.html. Formaldehyde is one in a large family of chemical compounds called volatile organic compounds or "VOCs." The term volatile means that the compounds vaporize at normal room temperatures. Some VOCs can cause watery eyes, burning sensations in the eyes, nose and throat, nausea, coughing, chest tightness, wheezing, skin rashes, and allergic reactions. Humidity and temperature will affect the off-gassing (release of gaseous chemicals from a solid material) of formaldehyde from products such as pressboard. Pressboard is commonly found in temporary school buildings. Although professional advice should be solicited to resolve concerns, the school can immediately respond to this concern by providing ventilation whenever possible. The EPA ranks indoor radon among the most serious environmental health problems facing us today. After smoking, it is the second leading cause of lung cancer in the United States causing an estimated fourteen thousand (14,000) lung cancer deaths a year. Radon is a naturally occurring gas that may seep into buildings from the surrounding soil. In some cases, well water may be a source of radon. You cannot see, taste, or smell radon. In fact, the only way to discover if high levels of radon are present is by testing. The National School Radon Survey estimated 19.3 percent of U.S. schools, nearly one in five, have at least one frequently occupied ground contact room with short-term radon levels above 4pCi/L - the level at which EPA recommends mitigation (US EPA, 1993). Radon can enter the school building or any other building when warm air rises, creating a vacuum in the lower areas of the school. Air seeps in from the soil around and under the school, and some air is sucked in through openings (cracks, doors, windows) on the lower levels. Radon gas decays into radioactive particles that can be trapped in the lungs. This can damage lung tissue and lead to lung cancer. An individual's risk of developing lung cancer from radon exposure depends on the dose and duration, as well as the presence of environmental tobacco smoke. The EPA recommends that all schools be tested for radon; as of February 1999 only 20 percent have been tested For additional information on radon, contact the National Safety Council at (800) SOS-RADON.
Carbon monoxide is produced by the incomplete combustion of carbon materials; any flame or combustion device is likely to emit carbon monoxide. Carbon monoxide may be present in auto shops, home economics or other kitchen rooms, or in rooms that take in air from areas where buses or other vehicles idle. Carbon monoxide can get trapped inside an area when: appliances do not work properly; a stove or furnace is not working properly due to a clogged chimney or vent; a car or bus is left running in an enclosed space or near an air intake area; or a charcoal grill is used in a closed area (CPSC, 1993). Carbon monoxide combines with hemoglobin to form carboxyhemoglobin, which is incapable of carrying oxygen, resulting in tissue anoxia. The health threat from exposure to CO is especially serious for those with cardiovascular disease. Healthy individuals may also be affected, but at higher levels of exposure. Early symptoms of exposure include flu-like symptoms (headache, fatigue, nausea). Principle manifestations of acute carbon monoxide poisoning are shortness of breath and a bright red color of mucus membranes (CPSC, 1993).
Mercury is a naturally-occurring element that is present throughout the environment. "Mercury contamination results from exposure through the air, water, food or soil, or through direct contact. Exposure to metallic mercury (as opposed to methylmercury that is ingested) occurs when it is not stored in a closed container. Contamination may include the spilling of metallic mercury on clothes, furniture, carpets, floors, walls, the natural environment, and even the human body. Metallic mercury and its vapors are extremely difficult to remove from items such as clothes, furniture, carpet, floors, and walls. The vapors will also accumulate in walls and other structures in contaminated rooms. The contamination can remain for months or years, posing a risk to exposed individuals" (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1997). "In the human body, mercury accumulates in the liver, kidney, brain, and blood. Mercury may cause acute or chronic health effects. Children exposed to metallic mercury for long periods may have trouble learning in school (Centers for Disease Control, 1997). Mercury is a recognized developmental neurotoxicant linked to mental retardation, gait and visual disturbances, neurological damage, and impairment of language, attention and memory. Repeated exposure to relatively low toxic levels can cause muscle tremor, irritability, personality changes or gingivitis." ( Reeder, R., 1995, p.2) Acute exposure (i.e., short term, high dose) is not common today due to greater precautions and decreased handling. However, acute effects may include severe gastrointestinal damage, cardiovascular collapse, or kidney failure, all of which could be fatal. Inhalation of 1-3 mg/m3 for 2-5 hours may cause headaches, salivation, metallic taste in the mouth, chills, cough, fever, tremors, abdominal cramps, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, tightness in the chest, difficulty breathing, fatigue, or lung irritation. Symptoms may be delayed in onset for a number of hours" (Michigan State University, 1996). If a mercury spill occurs, there are specific methods that should be used for clean-up. First, notify the hazardous materials team, which may be part of the local fire department. A spill will require the evacuation of persons and animals from the contamination site, the use of special equipment and ventilation, and the need to assess the effects to people who have come in contact with the contamination site. For an explanation of this process see the website for Health Care Without Harm.
Environmentally Preferable Products The selection of building products, cleaning products, art and science supplies, and many other products that are used in schools can influence the health risks in the school. The use of less toxic products in schools is recommended by many as a zero to low-cost way to help protect indoor air quality in schools. In addition to creating indoor air quality pollution, hazardous chemicals often create pollution during their manufacture and disposal. Some pollute water and air; others must be disposed of as hazardous waste, or cause more harm when their containers are buried in landfills or burned in incinerators (Healthy Schools Network ). Rubber cement, permanent felt tip markers, pottery glazes, enamels, spray fixatives, and other potentially hazardous materials are sold for use in schools, despite the fact that there are often animal and human studies demonstrating their toxicity. Chemicals used in arts and crafts supplies, and biological and chemical agents used for laboratory sciences, such as formaldehyde, may be toxic. Paints, glues, and other art, science, and vocational supplies contain chemicals that can be toxic to children and pollute the air. Industrial arts courses can expose children to metal dusts, fumes, and wood dust. Chemicals such as acetic acid, aminophenol, ammonia, hydrochloric acid, etc., are found in photo labs that often lack safety equipment and proper ventilation. Kiln firing can release clay dust, which can contain silica (known to cause fibrosis) and toxic gases such as carbon monoxide and heavy metals from the glazes. Home economics and theater exposures may include fabric dyes, oven cleaners, cosmetics, hairsprays, and fog and smoke effects generated from machines using glycols and mineral oil. Copy machines produce ozone that has been linked to lung problems and should be run only in well-ventilated rooms. Of the 80,000 chemicals in commercial use today, only a very small fraction have been individually tested for toxicity. Unless a chemical is a food, drug, or cosmetic, there are virtually no requirements for complete toxicity testing (animal or human). The 1996 Food Quality Protection Act now requires more extensive testing of pesticides than previously required. Tests on various chemicals acting in combination with one another are practically non-existent. Despite this, a wide variety of toxic or hazardous products are routinely used in buildings. Schools are no different, except the majority of school occupants are children packed very close together. Nurses or facility managers should obtain Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for any chemicals used in building. These can be obtained from the chemical manufacturer.
Involvement in product selection for use in our schools is of critical importance. Environmentally preferable purchasing (EPP) is an effective management tool defined by the Executive Order 13101 [PDF] as "products or services that have a lesser or reduced effect on human health and the environment when compared with competing products or services that serve the same purpose...". Some common examples of EPP include purchasing paper products and cleansers that do not contain chlorine, and non-toxic all purpose cleaners and art supplies. Nurses should advocate for the development of EPP standards to be included in school purchasing policies.
Nurses who work in school settings and nurses who are parents to children in school settings can play a significant role in affecting the environmental quality of schools. Because there is no single person who can "make" a school environmentally healthy and safe, a good place to start is with a committee of people who may each play a role in improving the school's environment. In many workplaces, health and safety committees provide the structure through which to address conditions that may pose risks to health. Because schools are both workplaces for adults and learning places for children, creating a health and safety committee can provide a forum in which a multidisciplinary team can learn about health and safety issues; develop and exercise assessment capabilities; prioritize concerns and issues; develop an intervention plan; and provide a feedback loop regarding the success of the remediation and other intervention activities. A health and safety committee can also propose policies. Some of the people who could be considered for a school health and safety committee would be teachers, principals, parents, custodial staff, facilities managers, a school board representative, and even a student. The Environmental Protection Agency has created an action kit entitled Indoor Air Quality Tools for Schools that provides a complete program that schools can implement to assess and address indoor air quality concerns. To obtain a kit at no cost, call the EPA clearing house at (800) 438-4318.
Nurses are becoming increasingly involved in environmental health issues. In this article, some of the key environmental health risks found inside schools have been presented, including pesticides, mercury, asthma triggers, formaldehyde, and carbon monoxide. Children's special vulnerabilities to environmental exposures were explored, especially as they pertain to the school-aged children. Nursing actions to reduce environmental exposures in schools were outlined, including directions for creating an environmentally-healthy nursing suite. Additionally, guidance was provided regarding collective action and advocacy through the creation of and participation in environmental health and safety committees. Nurses are vital members of the community in identifying and addressing environmental health issues and must begin to prepare themselves better for this role. There are several great resources that can assist you in your quest for an environmentally healthy school. The ANA's health and safety staff are a wealth of information. The Office of Children's Health Protection and the Indoor Environments Division at the EPA are extremely helpful, as are the national non-profit organizations: The Children's Environmental Health Network, the Healthy Schools Network, The Children Health and Environment Coalition, and The Center for Health and Environmental Justice (See the resource section for web site addresses). And finally, the University of Maryland has created a unique web site for nurses on environmental health. Nurses in the community (school nurses, public and community health nurses, and nurse-parents) can all play a significant role in the environmental health status of our schools. Nurses are trusted members of the community, seen as having the best interest of the community in mind. This trust can help nurses be educators and agents of change on environmental issues. EnviRN.umaryland.edu: a one-stop shop created by the University of Maryland School of Nursing for nurses interested in environmental health. American Nurses Association: see RN noharm/Pollution page for more on environmental health issues. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Children's Environmental Health Network: www.CEHN.org Healthy Schools Network: www.healthyschools.org Center for Health, Environment and Justice: www.chej.org National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) NCEH Provides expertise in environmental pesticide surveillance and disease outbreak investigations. Visit www.cdc.gov/nceh/ default.htm Consumer Product Safety Council: www.cpsc.gov Agency for Toxic Substance Disease Registry (ATSDR): For fact sheets and information on pesticides: www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html ATSDR Information Center toll-free at 1-888-422-8737 or e-mail ATSDRIC@cdc.gov Preventing Harm:
Health Care Without Harm: www.noharm.org The American Lung Association: www.lungusa.org, (800) LUNG-USA American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Environmental Health. (1999). Handbook of Pediatric Environmental Health. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics Bearer, C. (1995). Environmental Health Hazards: How Children Are Different From Adults. Future of Children Summer/Fall 1995;5(2):11-26. Buckley, J., Meadows, A., Kadin, M., Le Beau, M., Siegel, S., & Robison, L. (2000). Pesticide exposures in children with non-Hodgkins lymphoma. Cancer 89(11), 2315-12 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (1997, May). ATSDR and EPA warn the public about continuing patterns of metallic mercury exposure. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Epidemiology & Statistics Unit. (Jan, 2001). Trends in Asthma Morbidity and Mortality. Daniels, J., Olshan, A., & Savitz, D. (1997). Pesticides and childhood cancers. Environmental Health Perspectives, 105(10), 1068-77. GAO Report to the Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Government Affairs, U.S. Senate. Pesticides: Use, effects, and alternatives to pesticides in schools, November, 1999. Washington, DC: GAO/RCED-00-17. Guillette, E., Meza, M., Aquilar, M., Soto, A., & Garcia, I. (1998). An anthropological approach to the evaluation of preschool children exposed to pesticides in Mexico. Environmental Health Perspectives, 106(6), 347-353. Infante-Rivard, C, Labuda, D., Krajinovic, M. & Sinnett, D. (1999). Risk of childhood leukemia associated with exposure to pesticides and gene polymorphisms. Epidemiology, 10(5), 481-7. McBride, M. (1998). Childhood cancer and environmental contaminants. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 89(1), 53-62. Meinert, R., Schuz, J. Kalersch, U., Kaatsch, P., & Michaelis, J. (2000). Leukemia and non-Hodgkins lymphoma in childhood and exposure to pesticides: results of a register-based case-control study in Germany. American Journal of Epidemiology, 151(7), 639-46. Michigan State University, Office of Radiation, Chemical and Biological Safety. (1996). Moglia, D., Smith, A., MacIntosh, D. , & Somers, J. (2006). Prevalence and Implementation of IAQ Programs in U.S. Schools. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114 (1). Reeder, Rachel (1995). The case against mercury: Rx for pollution prevention. Washington, DC., Terrene Institute. Reigart, J. & Roberts, J. (1999). Recognition and Management of Pesticide Poisonings. (US EPA Publication No. 735-R-98-003). Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances. United States Consumer Product Commission. (1993). Protect your family and yourself from CO poisoning. (US Consumer PSC No 0-356-764). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (September, 1988). The Inside Story: A Guide to Indoor Air Quality. Washington, DC: Office of Air and Radiation, EPA. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). (July 1993). Radon Measurement in Schools. (EPA 402-R-92-014). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (September 27, 1999). Chlorpyrifos incident review update, memo by Jerome Blondell, health statistician, Health Effects Division. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Region 8. Pesticides, Toxic Chemicals & Children.
The above PDF document requires that you have Adobe Acrobat Readersoftware installed on your computer.It is best viewed with the Adobe Reader version 4.0 or above.If you do not have the Reader, or if you are using version 3.0 or below, you can download the latest version of the Acrobat Reader freefrom the Adobe site. Help with PDFs and using the Acrobat Reader
Previous: Abstract & Objectives
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||