Working With Adolescents: A Time of Opportunity
Working With Adolescents: A Time of Opportunity
Page 6

Table of Contents | Abstract & Objectives | page 1 | page 2 | page 3  
page 4 |page 5 |page 6 | page 7 |page 8 | page 9 | page 10
page 11 | References | Websites | Test


Moral Development

Building on Piaget's work, Kohlberg (1977) described three levels in the development of moral judgement: preconventional, conventional and postconventional. Adolescence marks the movement from the conventional level of moral judgement to postconventional (Neinstein, 2002). Early adolescents are typically in the conventional level of moral development. At this level, they are motivated by the need to meet expectations of external factors such as others' opinions and existing law (Feli & Maehr, 2000). These individuals hold simplistic conceptions of what is right. Postconventional orientation embraces more universal and abstract principles of justice, requiring formal operational thought. The focus moves from actions and motivations to please others, to autonomous moral principles that are based on the individual's own beliefs. The postconventional level of moral development begins in middle to late adolescence and is not achieved by all (Feli & Maehr, 2000). Males rely on thinking and deductive reasoning to reach the "autonomous moral self" (Wren, 1997). Kohlberg believes that the six-stage theory (each level subdivided into 2 stages) applies to both boys and girls; however, the theory is based on the study of boys.

In contrast, Carol Gilligan (1993) believes that moral development is different for girls and women. Women seem to exemplify the 3rd stage of six when moral development is measured using Kohlberg's scale. Gilligan (1993) describes an interdependent thinking style that incorporates thoughts and feelings to attain the "interdependent moral self". She states that moral development is centered on the understanding of responsibility and relationships rather than rights and rules. She views moral development in girls as a continuous process.

(Wren, 1997) compares the open systems model described by Kohlberg and the spiral model of moral development described by Gilligan. Kohlberg's (1977) model illustrates an impersonal, rule-guided process of decision-making. While Gilligan's (1993) model illustrates a continuous process influenced by life's experiences. It is important to be aware that boys and girls may follow a different process in moral development.

 

Previous: Cognitive Development
Next: Psychosocial Development

line
CATALOG  ABOUT CE  VIEW CART  LOG BACK IN WHAT'S NEW  WELCOME CE HOME  NURSINGWORLD HOME
line


Bookstore | NursingMall | Get CE updates via e-mail

© 2002 American Nurses Association