Nursing Classification module 2
Classification of Outcomes
page 1 | page 2 | page 3 | page 4 | page 5 | page 6
| page 7 | page 8 | page 9 | page 10 | page 11 | page 12
page 13 | page 14 | page 15 | page 16 | page 17
table of contents | references | test

Nurses have been developing outcome typologies in various specialty areas of practice for at least three decades. Early typologies (conceptual groupings) used general terms. Quality assurance programs provided the major impetus to development in the 1970s and 1980s. Currently, diagnosis-specific standards/guidelines for practice, cost containment, and development of computerized patient records give further impetus. Additionally, large projects were funded in nursing; outcomes were not as controversial as the term, nursing diagnosis (Simmons, 1980; Horn & Swain, 1978, Johnson & Maas, 1997).

Johnson and Maas have used similarity ratings and hierarchical clustering techniques to develop a taxonomy with 24 classes and six domains. These were used to classify the more than 200 outcomes and outcome indicators developed in their project. The domains are

  1. functional,
  2. physiologic, and
  3. psychosocial health,
  4. health knowledge and behavior,
  5. perceived health, and
  6. family health
(Johnson and Maas, 1998).

It is claimed that nursing is invisible in health care delivery because we have not articulated our contribution. Although recognized as incomplete, it is impressive to see a list of nurse-sensitive outcomes and know that this list represents a visible "image" of nursing's contribution to the nation's health.


previous: Outcome Classification
next: Intervention Classification

ANA Home pageCE homeView my cart
catalog welcome about CE updates what's new
© 1999 American Nurses Association