Fighting for Safe Chemicals

There is growing consensus that the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), enacted in 1976, to regulate the use of chemicals based on their risk to human health or the environment, is failing to protect Americans from toxic chemicals. In the 34 years since TSCA took effect, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been able to require testing on just 200 of the more than 80,000 new chemicals produced and used in the U.S., and just five chemicals have been regulated under this law. The surprising truth is that under current U.S. law, chemicals are allowed to enter our homes, workplaces, and communities with little or no testing for human toxicity.

Why Nurses Want Chemical Policy Reform

Because exposure in the workplace puts nurses and other health care workers at an even higher risk:

  • Nurses are exposed to industrial cleaners, floor strippers, pesticides, sterilants, disinfectants, chemotherapy, and a multitude of other chemicals in the workplace. Nurses in occupational health settings, emergency departments and visiting nurses encounter chemically contaminated patients routinely.
  • In partnership with Physicians for Social Responsibility, ANA joined in the release of a first‐of‐its‐kind bio‐monitoring study of physicians and nurses in October 2009. The inquiry found that all of the 20 participants had toxic chemicals associated with health care in their bodies. Each participant had at least 24 individual chemicals present, four of which are on the recently released EPA list of priority chemicals for regulation. These chemicals are all associated with chronic illness and physical disorders.

Because nurses care for those whose health has been affected by chemicals, and exposure has serious implications for public health:

  • Studies continue to demonstrate the link between Chemical exposure and serious illness, including cancer, reproductive and developmental disorders, neurologic diseases and asthma.
  • According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 133 million people in the U.S. –almost half of all Americans—are now living with these and other chronic diseases and conditions, which now account for 70% of deaths and 75% of US health care costs. i
  • Estimates of the proportion of the disease burden that can be attributed to chemicals vary widely, ranging from 1% of all disease to 5% of childhood cancer to 10% of diabetes, Parkinson’s disease, and neurodevelopmental deficits, to 30% of childhood asthma.ii
  • The Centers for Disease Control and Preventions Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals showed that over ninety percent of participants had Bisphenol A (BPA), Perfluorochemicals (PFCs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), among other chemicals as part of their body burden.
  • Babies are being born pre‐polluted. A study by the Environmental Working Group shows babies can carry a body burden of over 287 industrial chemicals prior to birth iii.
  • American women’s breast milk has the highest levels of brominated flame retardants in the world. iv

Reforming TSCA

In response to these very real concerns about TSCA, on April 15, Senator Frank Lautenberg (D‐NJ) introduced the Safe Chemicals Act of 2010 in the Senate, and Representatives Rush (D‐IL) and Waxman (D‐CA) released a discussion draft of the bill in the House. This long‐awaited, landmark legislation would overhaul the way the federal government protects the public from toxic chemicals.

The House and Senate versions of the legislation are not identical; however, both include a number of essential reforms that would substantially improve public health protections:

  • Requiring chemical companies to develop and make publicly available basic health and safety information for all chemicals.
  • Requiring chemicals to meet a safety standard that protects vulnerable subpopulations, including pregnant women and children.
  • A new program to identify communities that are “hot spots” for toxic chemicals and to take action to reduce exposures.
  • Expediting safety determinations and actions to restrict some of the most notorious chemicals, like formaldehyde, lead, and flame retardants.

While supporting the legislation, ANA and SCHF called for improvements in three critical areas. As currently drafted, the legislation would:

  • Allow hundreds of new chemicals to enter the market and be used in products for many years without first requiring them to be shown to be safe.
  • Not provide clear authority for EPA to immediately restrict production and use of the most dangerous chemicals, even persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT) chemicals like asbestos and lead, which already have been extensively studied and are restricted by governments around the world.
  • Would not require EPA to adopt the National Academy of Sciences recommendations to incorporate the best and latest science when determining the safety of chemicals, although the Senate bill does call on EPA to consider those recommendations.


i National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, The Power of Prevention: Chronic Disease…the

Public Health Challenge of the 21st Century, (Washington, DC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009).

ii Safer Chemicals Health Families, The Health Case for Reforming the Toxic Substances Control Act, (2010).


iv Health Care Without Harm: Flame Retardants

ANA Fights for Safe Chemicals

ANAs commitment to chemical policy reform began in 2006 when the ANA House of Delegates overwhelmingly passed a resolution entitled “Nursing Practice, Chemical Exposure and Right‐to‐Know.” In this landmark resolution, our members called on us to:

  • Promote action(s) at the state and national level that will reduce and streamline the elimination of toxic chemicals and require use of safer alternatives when possible.
  • Support disclosure about adverse health effects.
  • Demand adequate information on the health effects of chemicals before they enter our workplaces and homes. Studies continue to demonstrate the links between chemicals in everyday products and serious illnesses, and because of the many chemicals nurses and other health care workers are exposed to in the workplace, they are at even higher risk.

ANA strives to protect the health and well‐being of the 3.1 million registered nurses whose interests we represent, as well as that of patients and communities.

We know that chemical exposure is unsafe, both for nurses and patients, and the public: its time to change our nations chemical policy.

ANA is one of several founding organizations belonging to the diverse and growing coalition, Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families (SCHF). ANA agrees with SCHFs TSCA Reform platform:

  • Immediately initiate action on worst chemicals
  • Require basic information for all chemicals
  • Protect the most vulnerable
  • Use the best science and methods
  • Hold industry responsible for demonstrating chemical safety
  • Ensure environmental justice
  • Enhance government coordination
  • Promote safer alternatives
  • Ensure right to know